Re: Search Associates - white people only?
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 6:26 am
goblinhunter wrote:
> tangchao wrote:
> > Well we can see things haven't gone her way and she's immediately calling
> > people racist. I'd avoid her like the plague.
>
>
> I could doxx myself but your account is new, so I don’t want to rub in my success at
> the direct approach, but I do want to ask why you won’t comment about reasons for
> rejection? Because there are none. They don’t want to put in the effort to convince a
> school to take on someone who isn’t white.
>
> ..applying for search associates has no visual or audio element. They can’t judge my
> personality and say I’m a basket case and reject me as my references are great, and
> I’m more than qualified. They do ask for my photograph though :) I suppose looking
> at many Search Associates staff lists and seeing only one or two teachers in hard to
> fill spots is another damning point you won’t consider. From my own experiences, I
> know some incredible schools who discriminate openly due to the perception that a
> British person can only truly be ‘white’ - but to see it from a company like this is
> shameful.
>
> it’s weird to see people who don’t seem to know what the signup process is and blame
> me for supposedly missing details. You are assigned a recruiter and they ask for your
> CV multiple times, you provide all previous schools - if my references are bad, then
> why have I been offered other positions are schools people on this site salivate
> about?
>
> No reason was provided, I asked them to elaborate, and I was given a reason that I
> wouldn’t be competitive. This matches what was said by the SearchAssociates
> whistleblower, who said that they’re told it’s not worth wasting time on people of
> colour. I suppose this explains the white teachers who are principals with only a
> TEFL.
Be in the face, look in the eyes and call out a bully.
> tangchao wrote:
> > Well we can see things haven't gone her way and she's immediately calling
> > people racist. I'd avoid her like the plague.
>
>
> I could doxx myself but your account is new, so I don’t want to rub in my success at
> the direct approach, but I do want to ask why you won’t comment about reasons for
> rejection? Because there are none. They don’t want to put in the effort to convince a
> school to take on someone who isn’t white.
>
> ..applying for search associates has no visual or audio element. They can’t judge my
> personality and say I’m a basket case and reject me as my references are great, and
> I’m more than qualified. They do ask for my photograph though :) I suppose looking
> at many Search Associates staff lists and seeing only one or two teachers in hard to
> fill spots is another damning point you won’t consider. From my own experiences, I
> know some incredible schools who discriminate openly due to the perception that a
> British person can only truly be ‘white’ - but to see it from a company like this is
> shameful.
>
> it’s weird to see people who don’t seem to know what the signup process is and blame
> me for supposedly missing details. You are assigned a recruiter and they ask for your
> CV multiple times, you provide all previous schools - if my references are bad, then
> why have I been offered other positions are schools people on this site salivate
> about?
>
> No reason was provided, I asked them to elaborate, and I was given a reason that I
> wouldn’t be competitive. This matches what was said by the SearchAssociates
> whistleblower, who said that they’re told it’s not worth wasting time on people of
> colour. I suppose this explains the white teachers who are principals with only a
> TEFL.
Be in the face, look in the eyes and call out a bully.