The International Schools Review Forum

@Heliotrope

Thats the Koolaid talking, and what an IB cheerleader cultist would say, and I know better. IB isnt better, its not the best curriculum, it might be the best marketing and packaging, since many of the other IE curriculum especially the NCs dont really have to advertise as they are mandated to an extent by regulatory authorities, but better or the best, No.

I disagree with everything in your reply, but you're certainly entitled to your opinion.

@Heliotrope

We disagree.

@PsyGuy and @Heliotrope

Sadly off topic, can we try and stay focused to the original question at hand, cheers

We could, but thats not the typical dynamic.

It has opened the doors for you to experience a number of curricula, not curriculums.

lightstays wrote:
> It has opened the doors for you to experience a number of curricula, not
> curriculums.

No, @Spawnboy99 was correct using 'curriculums', and so are you.
From Merriam-Webster:

'curriculum' <noun>
cur·​ric·​u·​lum kə-ˈri-kyə-ləm
plural: 'curricula', also 'curriculums'

"As is the case with many nouns borrowed directly from Latin, there is often some confusion as to the proper way to form its plural. Both 'curricula' and 'curriculums' are considered correct."

While I would turn my nose at Merriam-Webster as an authoritative or definitive source on the English language, this is also confirmed in the OED, both curriculums and curricula are acceptable forms of usage; and I do defer to the OED as THE definitive authority in English language usage.

Oh for crying out loud, please

@Spawnboy99

Every try herding cats, it would be easier.