Vaccine info in CV?

Heliotrope
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 1:48 am

Re: Reply

Post by Heliotrope »

PsyGuy wrote:
> @Heliotrope
>
> Online teaching cant go on forever because you say it cant?
>
> Your making my points for me. Parents are eager for F2F teaching and
> students are "very much done" with online, and then make the leap
> that 100% vaccination. Students and parents would welcome going back to F2F
> if there wasnt a vaccine at all.
>
> The risk of infection is not zero, valid data shows that the vaccinated can
> get infected.
>
> We disagree.

It can't go on forever because schools, parents and students don't want it to continue forever.

Yes, as I said parents and students are eager, but that doesn't mean they're all completely careless (well, most students might be but most parents aren't) - if they have two options of in-person teaching (either 100% vaccinated staff or 100% unvaccinated staff) they will choose they one with the least amount of risk: the 100% vaccinated staff.

As I said before: I never said vaccinated teachers can't still get infected. But they have a 90% lower risk of infecting others (students and other teachers). And a school can order the teachers to keep their classroom ventilated and keep their distance from others.
PsyGuy
Posts: 10789
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:51 am
Location: Northern Europe

Reply

Post by PsyGuy »

@Heliotrope

Nice try walking it back. You identify a factor that gets you to the outcome you want (parents want F2F) and then use it to justify your claim (that its a selling point), as if the two are co-variates of one another, they arent.

Desire and want have all of zero to do with it. If the COVID19 . didnt have a vaccine or it was going to be a much longer prolonged pandemic remote learning would continue, because governments would dictate it so.

Creating a dichotomy between two options does not validate your claims. That one choice is preferential to another does not make it a selling point, there is a substantial difference between what people will choose and what they will pay coin for.

You dont know its 90%, youre relying on a study that thinks its 90%. there is no study or research available that can claim with 1.0 validity that it has accounted for the variance of all factors.
Heliotrope
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 1:48 am

Re: Reply

Post by Heliotrope »

If parents prefer a school with a 100% vaccinated staff over one that doesn't, then having a 100% vaccinated staff is a selling point for a school.

The '90% less likely to infect others' is from a thorough and peer-reviewed study. If it's good enough for the CDC, it's good enough for me.
PsyGuy
Posts: 10789
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:51 am
Location: Northern Europe

Reply

Post by PsyGuy »

@Heliotrope

No its not.
Your criterion and standards arent mine.
We disagree.
Heliotrope
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 1:48 am

Re: Reply

Post by Heliotrope »

Yes it is.
No they aren't.
Yes, we do.
Post Reply